不同安放方式扭王字块体护面稳定性试验研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Experimental study on armor block stability of accropode with different placement modes
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    针对国内外广泛使用的护面扭王字块体安放方式问题,对比分析了国内外相关行业规定,发现国外行业规范均规定采用随机安放方式,而我国行业规范增加规则安放方式,具体为队列式规则安放方式。采用波浪断面物理模型试验,对三种常用的安放方式进行了抗浪稳定性试验验证,发现随机安放方式抗浪稳定性最优,其次是正反式规则安放方式,队列式规则安放方式稳定性最差。我国现行行业规范中采用扭王字块体稳定系数KD值不适用于队列式规则安放方式,采用该值会得到偏于危险的计算结果。

    Abstract:

    To the problem of placement modes of accropode widely used at home and abroad,this paper compares and analyzes the relevant industry regulations at home and abroad,and finds that the foreign industry norms all stipulate the random placement mode,while the Chinese industry norms add the regular placement mode,specifically the queue-type regular placement mode.By using the wave cross-sectional physical model test,the stability test of three common placement modes is verified,and it is found that random placement mode has the best stability,followed by positive and negative regular placement mode,and queue-type regular placement mode has the worst stability.The current industry standards in our country use the KD value of the stability coefficient for accropode,which is not applicable to the queue type regular placement mode.Using this value will result in calculation results that are biased towards danger.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

夏运强,葛栋林,杨 佳,等.不同安放方式扭王字块体护面稳定性试验研究[J].水运工程,2025(6):23-29.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-06-19
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码