两种新型抛石护岸工艺在深水区应用效果对比*
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

江苏省水利科技项目(2017009); 江苏省水利科技项目(2018005); 江苏省科技厅创新能力建设计划—省属公益类科研院所自主科研经费项目(BM2018028)


Application effects comparison of two new riprap revetment technologies in deep water area
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    长江下游深水区由于水深流急,传统抛石护脚的施工难度极大。近年来,网兜散抛石和沉箱式抛石这两种新型抛石施工工艺发展迅速。以长江老海坝抛石护岸工程为例,对比了两种工艺的抛石效果与成本,抛石效果主要采用抛石增厚和抛石均匀度两个评价指标进行定量分析。结果表明:沉箱式抛石工艺虽然工程直接费用较高,但抛石增厚效果、抛石均匀度及施工工效均优于网兜散抛石。通过不同研究区的抛石效果对比可知,在深水区抛石效果稳定性控制方面,沉箱式抛石工艺优于网兜散抛石工艺。

    Abstract:

    The construction of traditional riprap revetment is very difficult in the deep water area of the lower reaches of the Yangtze River because of the deep water and rapid flow. In recent years,net pocket riprap and caisson riprap construction technology have developed rapidly. Taking the riprap revetment project of Laohaiba dam of the Yangtze River as an example,the riprap construction qualities and costs of the two technologies are compared,and the construction qualities are analyzed from two aspects of thickening value and uniformity. The results show that the direct costs of caisson riprap are high,but the thickening effect,construction uniformity and efficiency of caisson riprap are better than net pocket riprap. Through the comparison of riprap effect in different study areas,it can be seen that in terms of effect stability control,caisson riprap technology is better than net pocket riprap.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王茂枚,姜 果,赵 钢,等.两种新型抛石护岸工艺在深水区应用效果对比*[J].水运工程,2020(10):172-177.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-10-10
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码