国内外地基承载力确定方法的异同
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Similarities and differences of determination methods of foundation bearing capacity at home and abroad
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    针对境外岩土工程勘察中地基承载力确定方法与国内存在差异的问题,开展了国内外地基承载力确定方法异同的研究。依托阿布扎比哈里发港集装箱码头二期工程,采用解析公式法、标准贯入试验法进行对比分析。得出境外工程砂土地基中地基承载力宜采用标准贯入试验方法推算确定的结论,为境内外岩土工程勘察中地基承载力的确定提供了指导意义。

    Abstract:

    Considering differences between the determination methods of foundation bearing capacity in overseas geotechnical engineering investigation and that in China,this paper studies the similarities and differences of the determination methods of foundation bearing capacity in domestic and foreign countries.Based on Khalifa Port Container Terminal Phase Two,Abu Dhabi,the analytical formula method and standard penetration test method are used for comparative analysis.It is concluded that the standard penetration test method should be used to calculate and determine the bearing capacity of the foundation in the sand foundation of overseas projects,which provides guidance for the determination of the bearing capacity of the foundation in the geotechnical engineering investigation at home and abroad.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

高晓兵,陈刘浩,宋俊杰.国内外地基承载力确定方法的异同[J].水运工程,2020(5):249-253.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-05-18
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码