φ42 mm和φ50 mm两型钻杆标贯击数对比分析与修正*
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFB2604200)


Comparison and correction of standard penetration test count of φ42 mm and φ50 mm drill pipes
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    针对目前使用φ50 mm钻杆进行标贯试验而未对标贯击数进行修正的问题,对同一场地的φ42 mm和φ50 mm两型钻杆标贯击数进行测试,得到两型钻杆的锤击能比和标贯击数值,通过数据对比建立φ50 mm钻杆标贯击数修正方法。以深圳港盐田港区东港一期工程为例,测得两型钻杆在不同土层中的标贯击数。对比分析结果表明,φ50 mm钻杆的总输入能量较φ42 mm钻杆高约5%;根据两型钻杆锤击能比和标贯击数比值的关系,确定使用φ50 mm钻杆时,粉质黏土和中粗砂的标贯击数修正系数分别为0.85和0.87。

    Abstract:

    In view of the problem that φ50 mm drill pipe is used for standard penetration test(SPT) without correcting the SPT count,the SPT count of φ42 mm and φ50 mm drill pipes in the same site are tested,the hammer energy ratio and the SPT count of the two drill pipes are obtained,and the correction method of φ50 mm drill pipe SPT count through data comparison is established.Taking the first phase of Donggang project in Yantian port area,Shenzhen Port as an example,the SPT count of two types of drill pipe in different soil layers are measured.The results show that the total input energy of φ50 mm drill pipes is about 5% higher than that of φ42 mm drill pipe.According to the relationship between the hammer energy ratio of the two drill pipe types and the ratio of the SPT count,the correction coefficients of the SPT count of silty clay and medium coarse sand are 0.85 and 0.87 respectively when φ50 mm drill pipe is used in this site.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

陈 凯,杨秋芳.φ42 mm和φ50 mm两型钻杆标贯击数对比分析与修正*[J].水运工程,2025(3):80-84.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-03-19
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码