国内外船舶风荷载计算方法对比
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Comparison of ship wind load calculation methods in China and abroad
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    针对船舶风荷载计算中引用规范的范围不全、版本更新和船型应用局限等问题,选取中国、英国、美国以及OCIMF等4种现行主流行业规范进行分析研究,并以2.0万吨级杂货船为案例进行计算对比。结果表明计算结果有较大差异:对于横向分力,英美规范结果接近,中国规范明显偏大。对于纵向分力,艉向风时英国规范结果显著大于中美规范;艏向风时中英规范结果接近,均小于美国规范。建议根据适用船型、船舶数据的翔实程度、主风向角和管理要求等因素合理选用计算方法,有条件时采用数值模拟方法。

    Abstract:

    In view of the problems such as incomplete reference standards,version updates,and limited ship type applications in ship wind load calculation,this paper selects four current mainstream industry standards of China,the United Kingdom,the United States,and OCIMF for analysis and takes a 20,000-ton general cargo ship as a case for comparison.The results show that the calculation results are quite different.For the lateral component force,the results by standards of the United Kingdom and the United States are close,and that by the standard of China is obviously larger.For the longitudinal component,the results by the standard of the United Kingdom are significantly greater than those by the standard of the United States in the case of stern wind,and the results by standards of China and the United Kingdom are close in the case of bow wind,and both are smaller than those by the standard of the United States.The paper suggests that the calculation methods should be reasonably selected according to factors such as the applicable ship type,the fullness of ship data,the main wind angle,and management requirements,and the numerical simulation method should be used when conditions permit.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李 欣,夏运强,王海峰,等.国内外船舶风荷载计算方法对比[J].水运工程,2023(7):79-82.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-07-13
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码