中、欧、美岩土勘察布置的比较
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Contrast among Chinese, European and American standards for planning of geotechnical investigation
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    针对中外标准有关岩土勘察布置要求的差异化问题,进行了中标(GB 50021—2001《岩土工程勘察规范》、JTS 133—2013《水运工程岩土勘察规范》)、欧标(Eurocode 7《岩土工程设计规范》)和美标(《ASTM岩土勘察类标准》)有关岩土勘察布置要求的对比分析研究。研究发现,中外勘察标准在阶段划分、内容、方法、勘探点间距与深度、试验数量、勘察过程中的优化、施工阶段控制与监测等各个环节均存在明显差异,并在此基础上提出了海外勘察标准应用要点。这些研究成果有助于行业同仁对海外勘察标准的了解和使用,也利于中国勘察标准的国际接轨。

    Abstract:

    In view of the differences of planning of geotechnical investigation requirements between Chinese and foreign standards,comparative analysis and research on planning of geotechnical investigation requirements of Chinese standard (GB 50021—2001 Code for Investigation of Geotechnical Engineering,JTS 133—2013 Code for Geotechnical Investigation on Port and Waterway Engineering),European standard (Eurocode 7:Geotechnical design) and American standard (ASTM codes related to geotechnical investigation) were carried out.The study found that there were significant differences between the Chinese and foreign survey standards in terms of stage division,content,method,spacing and depth of exploration points,number of trials,optimization during surveying,control and monitoring of construction phases,and other aspects of the planning of investigation.We put forward the application points of overseas geotechnical investigation standards,which will help industry colleagues understand and use overseas investigation standards,and be beneficial to the international integration of Chinese standards.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

万中喜,任世锋,祁丽华.中、欧、美岩土勘察布置的比较[J].水运工程,2019(6):158-162.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-06-12
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码