PIANC及中国标准船舶有效撞击能计算对比分析
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Comparrative analysis against effective impact energy of vessel based on PIANC and Chinese standard
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    详细阐述了PIANC船舶有效撞击能的计算方法,并与中国标准进行对比,通过对比发现:PIANC的有效撞击能计算较中国标准更高,该标准考虑了柔性系数、泊位形状系数、偏心系数以及附加质量系数等影响因素,与中国标准相比,其关键差异取决于附加质量系数Cm,两种计算方法的结果比值接近Cm的取值。同时,PIANC还要求考虑异常靠泊工况,其影响系数为1.1~2.0。此外,PIANC中对船舶靠泊速度的建议值与中国标准也存在一定差异。

    Abstract:

    The calculation method of PIANC standards for vessel effective impact energy is described in detail and compared with the Chinese standard.The comparison results reveal that PIANC is a higher standard comparing with the Chinese for effective impact energy calculation,which considers influential factors including the softness factor,berth cushion factor,eccentric coefficients,as well as the added mass factor.Compared with Chinese standards,the key difference depends on the added mass coefficient Cm.The ratio of results based on the two methods is close to Cm.Meanwhile,PIANC requires that the abnormal berthing condition shall be considered and its impact factor is 1.1 to 2.0.In addition,there are some differences between PIANC recommended values for berthing velocity and that of Chinese standards.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张华平,冯建国,王君辉. PIANC及中国标准船舶有效撞击能计算对比分析[J].水运工程,2015(4):81-85.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2015-04-14
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码